MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152437940 · doi:10.1306/031700700977

Dolomite Formation in Caribbean Islands: Driven by Plate Tectonics?!

2000· article· en· W2152437940 on OpenAlexafffund
Hans G. Machel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyDolomitePlate tectonicsTectonicsPaleontologyGeochemistrySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Postdepositional dolomite occurs in the shallow subsurface of several Caribbean Islands in Tertiary and Pleistocene carbonates, e.g., on Barbados, Grand Cayman, Jamaica, and St. Croix. Recent investigations have interpreted these dolomites as relatively early-diagenetic formations from "chemically modified seawater", mainly on the basis of petrography, stratigraphic association, and stable isotope values. Interpretations of the hydrologic regimes during dolomitization vary and usually include freshwater-seawater mixing, thermal or density-driven convection of seawater, or a combination thereof. This paper offers two alternative interpretations based on the relatively low Sr isotope ratios of the dolomites (0.7085 to 0.7092) and their proximity to active plate margins. Dolomitization may have been driven by plate tectonics, i.e., either by thermal convection of pore fluids at active spreading centers or by tectonic expulsion of fluids from accretionary prisms. The dolomitizing solution was seawater that was enriched in 86Sr by magmatic-hydrothermal solutions or by interaction with siliciclastics in an accretionary prism, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207