MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152465184 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/59/1/091

Mechanism for femtosecond laser pulse patterning of self-assembled monolayers on gold-coated substrates

2007· article· en· W2152465184 on OpenAlexafffund
Sean E. Kirkwood, Mohammad Reza Shadnam, Alidad Amirfazli, R. Fedosejevs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFemtosecondMonolayerMaterials scienceLaserThin filmOptoelectronicsSelf-assembled monolayerLaser ablationNanotechnologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-assembled monolayer (SAM) patterning on gold thin films was performed using 800 nm, 118 fs laser pulses. SAM removal was ablative and was observed at fluences near the multishot ablation threshold for the thin gold film. Line widths six times smaller than the 2 e-folding intensity beam diameter were observed demonstrating sub-diffraction limited patterning with femtosecond lasers. Similar experimental results in air and N2 indicated that the removal process does not involve oxidation of the gold-sulfur bond as was claimed in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207