Modulation of Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity and Expression Is Associated with Aryl Hydrocarbon Resistance in Vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mutagenic effect of environmental carcinogens has been well documented in animal models and in human studies but the mechanisms involved in preventing carcinogen insult have not been fully elucidated. In this study we examined the molecular and biochemical changes associated with carcinogen resistance in a series of aryl hydrocarbon-resistant MCF-7 cell lines developed by exposure to benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The cell lines were designated as AH(R40), AH(R100), and AH(R200) to denote their increasing fold resistance to BP compared with wild type cells. These cell lines were also resistant to another aryl hydrocarbon (AH), dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, but not to pleiotropic drugs (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and taxol). The resistant cell lines showed an increase in the level of the primary intracellular antioxidant, reduced glutathione, corresponding to increasing AH resistance. However, there was no change in glutathione reductase activity. The generation of reduced glutathione requires NADPH, and we therefore examined the activity and expression of the rate-limiting enzyme in NADPH production, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD). An increase in G6PD specific activity was associated with increasing aryl hydrocarbon resistance. This was due to an increased expression of G6PD in resistant cells, which was demonstrated by increases in both protein and mRNA levels. However, there was no increase in the transcription rate of G6PD in the resistant cell lines, indicating that the increase G6PD expression is due to a post-transcriptional modulation, which was confirmed by actinomycin D chase experiments. These results demonstrate that modulation of G6PD expression and activity is an important mechanism in AH resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".