Review: Antiphospholipid antibodies in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus and the antiphospholipid syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is recognized increasingly as the most common acquired hypercoagulation state of autoimmune etiology and may occur as an isolated clinical entity (primary APS) or in association with an underlying systemic disease, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The major differences between pediatric and adult APS include absence of common acquired risk factors for thrombosis, absence of pregnancy-related morbidity, increased incidence of infection-induced antibodies, differences in cut-off values for determination of aPL and specific factors regarding long-term therapy in children. APS in children has been largely reported in patients with arterial or venous thromboses and less frequently in association with neurological or hematological manifestations. The presence of aPL in pediatric SLE can modify the disease expression and may be an important predictor of the development of irreversible organ damage. Two recently established international registries of neonates and children with APS provide a good opportunity to conduct large, prospective studies on the clinical significance of aPL and long-term outcome of pediatric APS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".