MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152500150 · doi:10.1109/tnn.2002.804285

Gaussian activation functions using Markov chains

2002· article· en· W2152500150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov chainGaussianStochastic computingArtificial neural networkSignal processingNonlinear systemOffset (computer science)Stochastic resonanceSigmoid functionStochastic processAlgorithmMarkov processDigital signal processingNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend, in two major ways, earlier work in which sigmoidal neural nonlinearities were implemented using stochastic counters. 1) We define the signal to noise limitations of unipolar and bipolar stochastic arithmetic and signal processing. 2) We generalize the use of stochastic counters to include neural transfer functions employed in Gaussian mixture models. The hardware advantages of (nonlinear) stochastic signal processing (SSP) may be offset by increased processing time; we quantify these issues. The ability to realize accurate Gaussian activation functions for neurons in pulsed digital networks using simple hardware with stochastic signals is also analyzed quantitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it