Field investigation of a suction break designed to control slope-induced desaturation in an oxygen barrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Covers with capillary barrier effects (CCBEs) can be used as oxygen barriers to limit gas flux into waste disposal sites. Laboratory and field measurements show that the hydraulic behaviour of such a layered cover system is influenced by its slope geometry and gravity drainage, which can result in local desaturation that may be detrimental to cover performance. Such desaturation can be minimized by placing a suction break in the moisture-retaining layer of the inclined cover. This novel approach was applied in the field to an existing inclined CCBE. The three-layer cover was then subjected to different boundary conditions to evaluate the influence of the suction break on hydraulic behaviour. Volumetric water content and suction measurements demonstrated that a zone of water saturation and low suction was created upslope of the suction break under natural climatic conditions. The hydrological behaviour close to the suction break was not significantly affected by a forced drought of 78 days (without water infiltration). The results also reveal that the suction break had a relatively limited upslope zone of influence (typically less than 10 m). The monitoring results are confirmed by geophysical measurements used to characterize water distribution in the inclined CCBE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".