Augmenting the visual presentation of Web search results
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improving the relevancy of Web search results has been of increasing interest in recent years. The nature of the Web implies heterogeneity, large volumes, and varied structures. Hence, finding results that best suit the needs of every individual is a very challenging problem. Accordingly, interactive graphical and visualization techniques are suggested to increase the ability of the display to handle large numbers of results while simultaneously presenting several attributes for each Web page. In addition, query reformulation and reconstruction is usually controlled by the search engine. Consequently, the results suffer from redundancy and/or irrelevancy. Integrating the user in the process of query reformulation - by visualizing the process itself - may benefit the overall search relevance. This paper presents an interactive Visual Search Engine (the VSE) in which both processes of query reformulation and results presentation are visualized. In the user study, the effectiveness of the VSE was demonstrated when compared to Google.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it