MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152571077 · doi:10.1093/fs/knp039

Problématiques identitaires et discours de l'exil dans les littératures francophones Problématiques identitaires et discours de l'exil dans les littératures francophones. Edited by A <scp>nissa</scp> T <scp>alahite</scp> -M <scp>oodley</scp> . Ottawa, Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa, 2007. 365 pp.

2009· article· fr· W2152571077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchHumanitiesAlienationMeaning (existential)ArtIdentity (music)Art historyHistorySociologyPhilosophyAestheticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anissa Talahite-Moodley's collection of essays on exile forms part of an intriguing new series on ‘transferts culturels’ from the Presses Universitaires d'Ottawa, and promises to offer a fresh critical perspective on the now familiar themes of marginality and alienation in francophone literature. Charles Bonn's preface sets out the volume's ambition not to treat exile and identity ‘comme des évidences, essentialistes, et inséparables de ces littératures dont elles fonderaient même l'existence’, but as literary and aesthetic concepts (p. ii). Taking into account the polemic surrounding the ‘littérature-monde’ movement, the work resists tendencies to reduce literature to sociology, and also troubles efforts to categorize francophone literary texts into discrete ethnic groups or ‘aires culturelles’. Both Bonn's preface and Moodley's postface cite Dominique Combe's call for a ‘poétique comparée’ and, certainly, the volume juxtaposes the readings of very different sorts of works by writers from a diversity of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The result is that the collection proposes no particular definition of exile but explores the many facets of this complex condition, its potential to act as a trigger for creative activity but also its association with suffering and deprivation. Indeed, Moodley notes that the term ‘exil’ bears meaning only when conceived in relation to a range of lived experiences, and reminds us that Christa Jones's reading of Assia Djebar's ‘Il n'y a pas d'exil’ demonstrates how ‘l'exil est donc un espace à l'intérieur duquel l’écrivain se définit comme libre et sujet de son discours' (p. 344). The diverse forms of exile analysed here are divided into four sections: ‘l'exil, le pays et la langue’, ‘l'exil postcolonial’, ‘l'exil au féminin’ and ‘l'exil existentiel’. Common themes crop up between the sections, however, and one interesting parallel is the way in which writers such as Leïla Sebbar, Azouz Begag, Marguerite Duras and Linda Lê, for example, share a preoccupation with unresolved parental relationships. Almost all the writers discussed experiment with the French language and seek new idioms in their attempts to understand experiences exile and uprooting. While the comparative approach and the commitment to treat texts as literary works rather than sociological testimonies are both highly laudable, however, the collection is ultimately somewhat formless. Some of the essays are both provocative and original, but others fall into the trap of feeding off their primary material, and the editor only briefly attempts to bring the articles together to articulate a larger conceptual purpose. This is another edited collection which, while containing intermittent insights, could have been more tightly unified so as to offer a more distinct innovation to the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207