Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated or Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Stimulated Monocytes Rapidly Express Biologically Active IL-15 on Their Cell Surface Independent of New Protein Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although IL-15 shares many of the biological activities of IL-2, IL-2 expression is primarily under transcriptional regulation, while the mechanisms involved in the regulation of IL-15 are complex and not completely understood. In the current study, we found that CD14(+) monocytes constitutively exhibit both IL-15 mRNA and protein. IL-15 protein was found stored intracellularly and stimulation of CD14(+) monocytes with either LPS or GM-CSF resulted in mobilization of IL-15 stores to the plasma membrane. This rapidly induced surface expression was the result of a translocation of preformed stores, confirming that posttranslational regulatory stages limit IL-15, because it was not accompanied by an increase in IL-15 mRNA and occurred independent of de novo protein synthesis. After fixation, activated monocytes, but not resting monocytes, were found to support T cell proliferation, and this effect was abrogated by the addition of an IL-15-neutralizing Ab. The presence of preformed IL-15 stores and the ability of stimulated monocytes to mobilize these stores to their surface in an active form is a novel mechanism of regulation for IL-15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".