MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152608316 · doi:10.1109/esscirc.2008.4681814

A 14-mW 2.4-GHz CMOS transceiver for short range wireless sensor applications

2008· article· en· W2152608316 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Yousefi, R. Mason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsTransceiverTransmitterCMOSElectrical engineeringPhase noisedBcFrequency synthesizerElectronic engineeringRadio frequencyBandwidth (computing)Center frequencyLocal oscillatorPhase-locked loopEngineeringTelecommunicationsBand-pass filterChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low power and energy efficient transceiver architecture is introduced. It is implemented on a single chip intended for use in short range radios based on WPAN (IEEE 802.15.4) at 2.4 GHz. The transmitter is based on a constant envelope modulator built around a dual loop frequency synthesizer coupled through an injection locking mechanism. The core of the dual conversion receiver is realized by reconfiguring the transmitter building blocks. Techniques are presented for tuning the center frequency and bandwidth of the RF filter, as well as generating the required local oscillator frequencies. The transceiver is fabricated in a 0.18-mum standard CMOS process. The receiver achieves -83-dBm sensitivity and -25 dBm 1-dB compression point. The transmitter outputs -7-dBm QPSK signal, while carrier phase noise is better than -108-dBc/Hz at 5-MHz offset. Active mode power consumption is 11-mW and 14-mW in receive and transmit modes, respectively, on a 1.6-V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207