MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152608646 · doi:10.1142/s0218126607003903

CIRCUIT TECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE WIRELESS TRANSFER OF POWER AND DATA TO ELECTRONIC IMPLANTS

2007· article· en· W2152608646 on OpenAlexafffund
ABDELOHAHAB DJEMOUAI, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Circuits Systems and Computers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDemodulationData transmissionPulse-width modulationController (irrigation)Electronic engineeringEnvelope detectorAmplitude-shift keyingTransmission (telecommunications)CMOSComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPhase-shift keyingChannel (broadcasting)VoltagePhysicsBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel circuit techniques and design approaches are proposed in this paper to build a controller dedicated to wireless power and data transmission systems used in the area of implantable devices such as sensors and neurostimulators. The aim of this controller is to regulate automatically the level of the power to be transferred and to modulate the carrier signals during data transmission. It includes several new integrated building blocks such as integrated pulse-width modulator (PWM), RF envelope detector, frequency-locked loop (FLL), and amplitude-shift keying (ASK) modulator and demodulator. CMOS 0.18 μm technology is used to implement this controller that operates at 1.8 V power supply and a frequency of 20 MHz. Preliminary postlayout simulation results prove that all the main blocks of the controller (the FLL, the PWM, and the ASKD) operate adequately. From simulation results, the time response of the system is estimated at 0.8 μs. The complete controller has been recently submitted for fabrication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Circuits Systems and ComputersSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207