MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152619316 · doi:10.1139/p09-030

Optical properties of nematic liquid crystal (C<sub>21</sub>H<sub>27</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>S) under AC/DC electric fields

2009· article· en· W2152619316 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehriban Emek, Nurettin Beșlı, Ahmet Yıldırım, Süleyman Yılmaz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldLiquid crystalPhysicsCondensed matter physicsFréedericksz transitionPhase transitionPolarizerOpticsPhase (matter)TransmittanceMesophaseBirefringence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the effects of the phase transition on the optical transmittance of the nematic liquid crystal C 21 H 27 NO 2 S, 4′-isothiocyanatophenyl-4-pentylbicyclo[2,2,2]octane-1-carboxylate are investigated in terms of temperature variation and rotational angle of the polarizer through electro-optical methods under AC / DC electric fields. It is observed that the domain structure of the material is affected considerably by the applied electric field as the temperature changes. Under applied electric fields, the crystal-nematic (CN) phase-transition point changes and the behaviour of the liquid crystal in the phase-transition region shows some differences. The intensity of the light passing through the system under a DC electric field increases as the electric field rises. Nevertheless, the intensity of the transmitted light under an AC electric field increases at the beginning and then decreases as the electric field rises to a temperature of more than 355 K. These results can be explained through the formation of a domain structure during the phase-transition process and the light scattering caused by these structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207