MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152671821 · doi:10.1109/haptic.2003.1191278

Levels of detail in reducing cost of haptic rendering: a preliminary user study

2003· article· en· W2152671821 on OpenAlexafffund
Jian Zhang, Shahram Payandeh, John C. Dill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsHaptic technologyComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)StereotaxyPerceptionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceHaptic perceptionComputationComputer graphics (images)Virtual realityHuman–computer interactionPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haptic rendering complex objects in virtual environments is computationally intensive. We start the investigation of a new category of approach to reducing the computation in haptic rendering. Our approach is based on the hypothesis that the accuracy of haptic perception might be limited. Results of the experiments described in this paper suggest that subjects might not be able to distinguish two haptic objects if they are beyond some refinement level. This limitation of haptic perception may be taken advantage of in haptic rendering by replacing a fine object with a coarser object to reduce scene complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207