MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152678480 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353557

Modulation of vergence during the vestibulo-ocular reflex

2007· article· en· W2152678480 on OpenAlexaff
Elham Khojasteh, Henrietta L. Galiana

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVergence (optics)Vestibulo–ocular reflexReflexVestibular systemEye movementPhysicsBinocular visionPsychologyOpticsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is commonly believed that during the compensatory slow-phases of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), eyes move in a perfectly conjugate fashion (i.e. the vergence component is zero). Consequently, VOR measurements are often restricted to either conjugate recordings or to single eye recordings. During binocular recordings of the angular VOR in the dark, we observed a significant vergence component even in normal subjects. More interestingly, the measured vergence component modulated with head velocity. The modulation of vergence during the VOR in the dark could imply a vestibular contribution to vergence. These observations suggest a shared central controller for both version and vergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207