MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152683414 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2013.2290620

Multi-Level Coded Modulation for 16-ary Constellations in Presence of Phase Noise

2014· article· en· W2152683414 on OpenAlexaff
Ramtin Farhoudi, Leslie A. Rusch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationPhase noiseConstellation diagramBit error rateQuantum noisePhase-shift keyingNoise (video)Modulation (music)Block Error RateAlgorithmElectronic engineeringComputer scienceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsPhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Application of multi-level coded modulation (MLCM) for 16-ary constellations in coherent systems is studied. An MLCM system with Reed-Solomon component codes and multi-stage decoder is considered. A systematic numerical method for finding set-partitioning and optimal code rates is presented. The method only requires the probability density function of received samples and can be applied to any constellation regardless of irregularity or lack of symmetry. Performance of the designed MLCM system is verified in presence of nonlinear phase noise and normal phase noise. For nonlinear phase noise limited system, it is shown that the block error rate (BLER) of the system can be improved using our approach for set-partitioning. For phase noise limited system, both BLER and bit error rate (BER) are studied for a phase noise optimized and square 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (16QAM). Post forward-error correction (FEC) BER performance of the optimized constellation over square 16QAM is studied for different levels of phase noise. It is shown that the optimized constellation along with MLCM system decreases the required signal-to-noise ratio by several dB at high phase noise regime and low post FEC BER.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207