MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152711764 · doi:10.1093/ije/dyi002

The New Global Threat. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and Its Impacts. Tommy Koh, Aileen Plant, Eng Hin Lee. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2004, pp. 356, $17.00 (PB) ISBN: 9812386688

2004· article· en· W2152711764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Salter

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Epidemiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingScientific publishingMedicinePolitical scienceLibrary scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the annals of epidemiology 2003 will be remembered as the year that communicable disease surveillance came of age. The impetus for this right of passage was the emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) onto the world stage and its rapid spread to over 30 countries resulting in over 8000 cases. Due to fortuitous epidemiological characteristics and unprecedented international collaboration and leadership the outbreak was brought under control within months of its recognition. Koh, Plant, and Lee's book provides an excellent taster of the scientific, political, social, and economic consequences of an international outbreak that paid no respect to international boundaries and resulted in the deaths of over 700 individuals. This book condenses in a relatively small tome a wealth of information gained in a short period of time with specific reference to SARS as viewed in the major affected areas of China, Hong Kong SAR, Taiwan, and Toronto. The book's thrust is achieved by bringing together chapters written by individuals, representing teams that were in the thick of the epidemic. The first section and the editorial by Plant provide an insight into the vital role of the WHO in co-ordinating and leading the international response to SARS. It juxtaposes a number of concerns experienced by the WHO and how it set out to meet the challenges facing it. Many of the chapters provide a chronology of SARS as it appeared in various countries and makes inroads, albeit in a limited fashion, into how affected areas responded to the crisis as it unfolded and how they attempted to re-establish themselves as areas that were safe to visit and trade with after WHO travel advisories had been lifted. For the more practically minded Stanton and Yuen and Peiris recall the pressure placed upon teams of clinicians and virologists around the world to come up with the answers as to what the causative agent for SARS was and to devise a regime for treating affected individuals. Within weeks the former was a reality with discovery of SARS Coronavirus. The latter has to date proven to be a much more demanding challenge with no consistently effective treatment having been identified. On looking back many have argued as to why we were not prepared for SARS and why we had to rely on the basic principles of early detection and isolation. On infection control, Tambyah gives a very illuminating, though he stresses opinionated, insight into infection control polices in hospitals during SARS and highlights the confusing picture presented by the various guidelines for personal protective equipment (PPE) and quarantining in the event of identifying probable or suspect cases of SARS. In many areas SARS was considered to be the worst crisis in living memory. In Hong Kong SARS was considered the greatest challenge since the Second World War. However local commentators have reported that SARS has in fact helped the people of Hong Kong, locals and foreigners, to find a new collective identity irrespective of the government. Further chapters examine the impact of the outbreak as it occurred in affected areas. Within each of the sections a number of themes emerge as being of significance, in particular political, social, and individual responsibilities and the implication for society at national and international levels. For example in section II emphasis is placed on how, in China, a large and previously very restrictive country wrestled with SARS as it progressed and how this contributed to the shaping of a new government, sworn into office in the early days of the outbreak being recognized. This is echoed in chapters 5, 11, and 12, which suggests that the repercussions of SARS for the Asian countries go well beyond loss of life and economic loss and will have significant social consequences. Ho in, national government responses, analyses what he describes as ‘inept policies’ which for some created political legitimacy and in others led to resignations and enhancement of the crisis. In a similar vain Bishop describes the psychological impact of the SARS outbreak and the mechanisms of response in populations and individuals and the elements of discrimination and stigma engendered. Many lessons have been learned from SARS. Yuen and Peiris pick out three salient lessons as being of great importance: (i) intelligence gathering, especially from areas with poor surveillance infrastructures, (ii) risk assessments and monitoring at potential epidemic centres (healthcare facilities and wet markets), and (iii) effective communication to all sectors. Of all the lessons learned Chan sums it up in perhaps the most optimistic manner by suggesting for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome we should now consider Sustainable Action for the Rejuvenation of Society. For those who like a good informative read that can be taken on as bite size chunks I recommend this as a reliable account of what took place during the SARS outbreak of 2003 and more importantly what we need to prepare for in the future. For SARS, many factors played to our strengths. Next time, if unprepared, we may not be so lucky.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of EpidemiologySame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207