MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152750218 · doi:10.1109/icip.1995.537446

Motion estimation for region-based video coding

2002· article· en· W2152750218 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion estimationQuarter-pixel motionComputer scienceLossy compressionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMotion fieldData compressionBlock-matching algorithmMotion compensationVideo trackingVideo processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Region-based video compression has been a very active research area over the last few years. It has been viewed as a potential alternative to traditional schemes suffering from the "blockiness" of image intensities at very low bit rates. We present a new approach to region-based representation and motion estimation. It is based on the observation that motion boundaries usually coincide with region boundaries. Thus, we first compute an intensity-based image partition and use it as an initial step in a 3-step algorithm: motion estimation for intensity-derived regions, motion-based region fusion and adjustment of region boundaries. We present experimental results for standard QCIF images and compare our method with block matching and dense motion field estimation. We also study the performance loss due to a lossy transmission of partition information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it