MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152778028 · doi:10.1071/rd01020

Effect of centrifugation on early embryonic development and parthenogenetic activation of bovine oocytes matured <i>in vitro</i>

2001· article· en· W2152778028 on OpenAlexafffund
B.R. Downey, Robert F. Casper, Ri‐Cheng Chian

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyOocyte activationParthenogenesisHuman fertilizationCentrifugationEmbryogenesisEmbryoIn vitro maturationOocyteIn vitroIn vitro fertilisationBiologyChemistryAnatomyCell biologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the fertilization, early developmental competence and capacity for parthenogenetic activation of bovine oocytes matured in vitro after centrifugation. Immature oocytes were cultured in tissue culture medium 199 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 75 mIU mL(-1) FSH + LH at 5% CO2 to facilitate maturation. After culture for 24 or 30 h, the metaphase-II stage oocytes were centrifuged at 3000, 5000, 7000 or 10000g for 5 min before in vitro fertilization or parthenogenetic activation. Frozen-thawed bull semen was used for in vitro fertilization. For parthenogenetic activation, the oocytes were exposed to 20 microM calcium ionophore A23187 for 5 min at room temperature. Fertilization rates were not different between control and treatment groups (87.7% v. 74.6%, 73.4%, 75.9% and 76.4% respectively). Also, there were no differences in early embryonic development between control and treatment groups (rates of blastocyst formation were 21.1% v 20.2%, 28.8%, 31.2% and 24.1% respectively). When the oocytes were centrifuged at various speeds alone, the activation rate of oocytes was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the 10000g treatment group compared with control (10.8% v 0.0%). There were no differences in the activation rates of oocytes between control and treatment groups at speeds up to 7000g (70.9% v. 71.9%, 78.3% and 77.2% respectively) after centrifugation and stimulation with Ca(2+)-ionophore. However, the activation rate of oocytes was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the 10000g treatment group compared with control (70.9% v. 83.1%). In addition, the percentage of activated oocytes with diploid formation was significantly higher in the oocytes after centrifugation at 10000g and stimulation with calcium ionophore A23187 than in the control (18.4% v 7.1%). These results indicate that centrifugation of oocytes matured in vitro has no detrimental effect on fertilization and subsequent early embryonic development. They also indicate that the oocytes might be parthenogenetically activated after centrifugation and that high-speed centrifugation may induce activation of some oocytes. The results suggest that the optimal speed for centrifugation of bovine oocytes might be < or = 7000g to enhance the visibility of nuclear elements for further micromanipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207