MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152791016 · doi:10.1172/jci18236

Transplacental thyroxine and fetal brain development

2003· review· en· W2152791016 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. Thomas Zoeller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Investigation · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster UniversityHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsThyroidHormoneEndocrinologyOffspringInternal medicineMedicineFetusPregnancyTransplacentalThyroid functionBiologyPlacenta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

in nature, I predict that mice with no heparan sulfate activity will develop thrombosis, supporting the concept that heparan sulfate is antithrombotic.These mice also should exhibit more profound intrauterine growth retardation than 3-OST-1 knockouts (15), thereby demonstrating a biological gradient for this unexpected finding depending on the extent to which heparan sulfate activity is reduced. SummaryWith their studies in 3-OST-1 knockout mice, HajMohammadi and colleagues (15) have advanced our understanding of the pathways that regulate thrombin.Antithrombin is critical for thrombin regulation because even partial deficiency is associated with thrombosis.In contrast, complete deficiency of heparan sulfate activity is necessary to provoke thrombosis.These findings suggest that small amounts of residual heparan sulfate activity are sufficient to catalyze antithrombin or that other vessel wall glycosaminoglycans can compensate for all but complete lack of heparan sulfate activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical InvestigationSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207