Analisa Faktor Suriah Di Balik Pemutusan Hubungan Diplomatik Kanada Terhadap Iran Tahun 2012
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bilateral relations between Canada and Iran have fluctuated since 2003 followed by cutting of their relations in 2012 by Canada. Analysis was conducted with strategic culture theory which aimed to elaborate foreign policy transformations year by year by Canada within circumstances of bilateral relations with Iran. The alteration of Canada foreign policy towards Iran did not only cause by Canada internal factor, but there are several crucial external factors that leveraged it simultaneously. The observer found that the utmost internal factor could cause the alteration mainly came from Canada strategic culture consistency such as peacekeeping actions, human rights agendas, and promoting democracy. Nevertheless, supplementary factors –which came from external factors, also trigger the happening of Canada-Iran disharmony relations focused on the involvement of Iran in the latest Syrian conflict and it indicated Iran actions were irrelevant with Canada strategic culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it