MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152849531 · doi:10.1107/s0907444900019727

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of native and selenomethionine fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from<i>Thermus aquaticus</i>

2001· article· en· W2152849531 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Sauvé, J. Sygusch

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAldolase AFructose-bisphosphate aldolaseThermus aquaticusChemistryCrystallographyThermophileBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (E.C. 4.1.2) catalyses the reversible cleavage of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate in the glycolytic pathway of prokaryote and eukaryote organisms. The enzyme was obtained from the extreme thermophile Thermus aquaticus and, in contrast to mesophilic aldolases, expresses maximal activity in the presence of Co(2+) as cofactor instead of Zn(2+). The purified recombinant protein was monodisperse according to dynamic light-scattering measurements. Crystals of recombinant native class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from T. aquaticus were obtained from two different starting conditions at low protein concentrations. Condition I, using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method, yielded monoclinic crystals having space group P2 and unit-cell parameters a = 99.5, b = 57.5, c = 138.6 A, beta = 90.25 degrees. Diffraction data were collected to 2 A resolution at beamline X8-C of the NSLS synchrotron-radiation source. Native and selenomethionine-substituted protein crystals were obtained from condition II by hanging-drop vapor diffusion. The tetragonal crystals of the native protein belong to the space group P4(1), with unit-cell parameters a = b = 88.8, c = 163.1 A, while those of the SeMet protein have space group I4(1), with unit-cell parameters a = b = 88.6, c = 164.1 A. A data set suitable for MAD phasing was collected to 2.6 A resolution at beamline X8-C of the NSLS synchrotron source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207