MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152935120 · doi:10.1530/reprod/119.2.207

Opioidergic, dopaminergic and adrenergic regulation of LH secretion in prepubertal heifers

2000· article· en· W2152935120 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Honaramooz

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpioidergicDopaminergic(+)-NaloxoneEndocrinologyPhenoxybenzamineSulpirideInternal medicineEndogenous opioidOpioid antagonistAntagonistDopamineOpioidDopaminergic pathwaysChemistryMedicinePropranololReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies have shown inhibitory effects of endogenous opioids on LH secretion in early post-natal heifers. However, it is not clear whether these effects change during the rest of the prepubertal period or whether the inhibitory influences on the GnRH neurones are direct or by way of other neuronal systems. Two experiments were performed in heifer calves to study the developmental patterns of opioidergic, dopaminergic and adrenergic regulation of LH and the possible interactions between opioids and dopaminergic and adrenergic neuronal systems, in the regulation of LH secretion. In Expt 1 four groups each of five heifer calves were used. Blood samples were taken every 15 min for 10 h and each calf received one of the following treatments as a single injection at 4, 14, 24, 36 and 48 weeks of age: (i) naloxone (opioid antagonist, 1 mg kg(-1), i. v.); (ii) sulpiride (dopamine D2 antagonist, 0.59 mg kg(-1), s.c.); (iii) naloxone and sulpiride combined; or (iv) vehicle (control group). Treatments began after the first blood sample was taken. The design of Expt 2 was similar; a separate group of heifer calves was assigned to receive one of the following treatments as a single injection at 4, 14, 24, 36 and 48 weeks of age: (i) naloxone; (ii) phenoxybenzamine (an alpha-adrenoreceptor blocker, 0.8 mg kg(-1), i. v.); (iii) naloxone and phenoxybenzamine; (iv) or vehicle. Results from Expt 1 showed that the maximum concentration of LH and the number of calves responding to treatments with an LH pulse was higher in the first hour after treatments at 36 and 48 weeks of age in the naloxone group compared with the control or sulpiride groups (P < 0.05). These values in the naloxone group also increased over time and were greatest at 48 weeks of age (P < 0.05). In heifers given naloxone + sulpiride treatment at 36 and 48 weeks of age, maximum concentrations of LH in the first hour after treatment did not differ from the naloxone and control groups. In Expt 2, at 36 and 48 weeks of age, treatment with naloxone with or without phenoxybenzamine resulted in higher concentrations of LH than in the controls (P < 0.05). No pulses were seen over the first hour of treatment at 36 and 48 weeks of age in heifers treated with phenoxybenzamine. The 10 h periods of blood sampling at 48 weeks of age revealed that phenoxybenzamine alone suppressed LH pulse frequency and mean serum concentrations of LH compared with the control group (P < 0.05). It was concluded that a strong or more acute inhibition of LH secretion by endogenous opioids developed in mid- to late prepubertal heifers, or alternatively, that removal of opioidergic inhibition at the GnRH neurone unmasked stimulatory inputs that were greater in heifers close to first ovulation. Since sulpiride appeared to negate in part the effects of naloxone on LH release, the suppressive effects of opioids could be exerted in part through the inhibition or blocking of a stimulatory dopaminergic system. alpha-Adrenergic neuronal systems have stimulatory effects on LH release, especially during the late prepubertal period, but do not appear to mediate opioidergic inhibition of LH secretion in prepubertal heifer calves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductionSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207