MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152969430 · doi:10.1115/1.4003686

Parameter Identification in Multibody Systems Using Lie Series Solutions and Symbolic Computation

2011· article· en· W2152969430 on OpenAlexafffund
C. P. Vyasarayani, Thomas K. Uchida, John McPhee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaToyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North AmericaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)ComputationMultibody systemSymbolic computationIdentification (biology)Lie groupSystem identificationComputer scienceMechanical systemTaylor seriesApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)MathematicsAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceGeometryData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the application of the Lie series to the problem of parameter identification in multibody systems. Symbolic computing is used to generate the equations of motion and the associated Lie series solutions automatically. The symbolic Lie series solutions are used to define a procedure for computing the sum of the squared Euclidean distances between the true generalized coordinates and those obtained from a simulation using approximate system parameters. This procedure is then used as an objective function in a numerical optimization routine to estimate the unknown parameters in a multibody system. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated by estimating the parameters of a structural system, a spatial slider-crank mechanism, and an eight-degree- of-freedom vehicle model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational and Nonlinear DynamicsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207