MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152982916 · doi:10.1109/sips.2005.1579965

SIMD implementation of interpolation in algebraic soft-decision Reed-Solomon decoding

2006· article· en· W2152982916 on OpenAlexaff
Laurier Boulianne, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIMDComputer scienceParallel computingReed–Solomon error correctionSpeedupDecoding methodsInterpolation (computer graphics)AlgorithmBlock codeConcatenated error correction codeFrame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Koetter-Vardy algorithm is an algebraic soft-decision decoding algorithm for Reed-Solomon codes. Software implementations of the Koetter-Vardy algorithm are considered as part of a redecoding architecture that augments a hardware hard-decision decoder with soft-decision decoding software on an embedded processor. In this paper we investigate the implementation of the interpolation step of the Koetter-Vardy algorithm on SIMD processor architectures. A parallelization of the algorithm is given using the K'th order Horner's rule for parallel polynomial evaluation. The SIMD algorithm has a running time 2.5 to 4 times faster than a serial implementation on a DSP processor. To gain further speedup we propose a merged-SIMD architecture that calculates the Hasse derivative in parallel with the polynomial updates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207