MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152988726 · doi:10.1261/rna.5227904

Loss of the mRNA-like region in mitochondrial tmRNAs of jakobids

2004· article· en· W2152988726 on OpenAlexafffund
Yannick Jacob, Elias Seif, PIERRE-OLIVIER PAQUET, B. Franz Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsBiologyMessenger RNAMitochondrial DNAGeneticsEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyCell biologyMolecular biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been postulated that a highly reduced form of transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA), a bacterial molecule involved in the rescue of stalled ribosomes during translation, is expressed in the mitochondrion of the jakobid Reclinomonas americana. Here we show that genes encoding both one-piece and two-piece tmRNAs are present in six different jakobid mitochondrial DNAs. Mitochondrial tmRNAs have retained the highly conserved tRNA(Ala)-like domain, but they apparently lack the mRNA-like region present in all bacterial tmRNAs. Comparative analysis of jakobid mitochondrial genomes shows that a potential mRNA-like region in R. americana (orf64) is located at distant genomic positions in other jakobids. Our results strongly suggest that orf64 is a tatA homolog. Through Northern hybridization we confirm the postulated reduced size of both a one-piece tmRNA in Jakoba libera and a two-piece tmRNA in Seculamonas ecuadoriensis. The J. libera tmRNA is post-transcriptionally modified by addition of a 3' CCA tail, processed in vitro by RNase P RNA, and specifically charged with alanine in vitro by alanyl-tRNA synthetase. Our results strongly support the functionality of these reduced mitochondrial tmRNAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNASame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207