MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W215300666 · doi:10.3138/cjh.45.1.83

<i>Ex Unitate Vires</i>: Elite Consolidation and the Union of South Africa, 1902-10

2010· article· en· W215300666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jill Campbell-Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth African History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElitePoliticsConsolidation (business)White (mutation)Political sciencePower (physics)Economic historyLawSociologyHistoryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the crucial period between 1902 and 1910 in South Africa’s political history. It focuses on the particular roles played by a small group of elite politicians in the formation of union, including Generals Louis Botha and Jan Smuts, J.X. Merriman, and a group of men known as the “kindergarten.” This group undertook an imaginative process that resulted in the political construction of the Union of South Africa. They came to believe in a pan-South African ideal that would unify white English- and Afrikaans-speaking South Africans. They pursued this goal in order to consolidate white power, create a new white nation, and strengthen South Africa politically and economically. In the process, they also hoped to maintain control over what was perceived to be an inferior and encroaching black majority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicSouth African History and CultureFrench-language works237,207