MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153045476 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2005.1594204

Derivation of a formula for the probability of false alarm for the FFT filter bank-based J-out-of-L CFAR detector

2005· article· en· W2153045476 on OpenAlexaff
Sichun Wang, Robert Inkol, Sreeraman Rajan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorFast Fourier transformConstant false alarm rateFalse alarmAlgorithmFilter (signal processing)MathematicsAdditive white Gaussian noiseFilter bankStatisticsComputer scienceWhite noiseTelecommunicationsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A formula is derived for the probability of false alarm (P/sub fa/) for the FFT filter bank-based J-out-of-L CFAR detector for AWGN channels when the input data is overlapped. Practical approximations for P/sub fa/ are then deduced. These approximations are valid when the overlap ratio, /spl gamma/ > 0, does not exceed 1/4 . For the Blackmail and Blackman-Harris windows, when 1/4 /spl les/ /spl gamma/ /spl les/ 1/2 , these approximations still hold. The validity of these approximations has been confirmed by simulation experiments. In addition, results showing the performance improvement that can be obtained from data overlapping for a given observation time are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207