MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153045866 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.6812

TNF Type 2 Receptor (p75) Lowers the Threshold of T Cell Activation

2001· article· en· W2153045866 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Y. Kim, Hung‐Sia Teh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD28T-cell receptorT cellIL-2 receptorCD8Cell biologyCD69ReceptorCytotoxic T cellAgonistBiologyImmunologyChemistryMolecular biologyAntigenImmune systemBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cell activation requires a threshold amount of TCR-mediated signals, an amount that is reduced by signals mediated through costimulatory molecules expressed on the T cell surface. Here the role of TNFR2 (p75) as a putative costimulatory receptor for T cell activation was examined. It was found that p75 deficiency in CD8(+) T cells increased the requirements for TCR agonist approximately 5-fold. Furthermore, p75(-/-) T cells display a marked reduction in the proliferative response to TCR agonist. This hypoproliferative response was associated with delayed kinetics of induction of the acute activation markers CD25 and CD69 as well as a marked decrease in the production of IL-2 and IFN-gamma. The net result is that very few cells are recruited into the dividing population. Interestingly, CD28 costimulation was only partially effective in rescuing the proliferative defect of p75(-/-)CD8(+) T cells. Thus, p75 provides an important costimulatory signal in addition to that provided by CD28 toward optimal T cell proliferation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207