Accompagnement psychoéducatif et processus de mobilisation dans les services de garde à la petite enfance : recherche partenariale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif premier de cet article est d’illustrer, dans le domaine de la recherche appliquée et partenariale, une utilisation du modèle psychoéducatif s’inspirant de la théorie historico-culturelle de Vygotski (1929/2004; 1934/1978). De plus, les auteures tentent d’intégrer au processus d’apprentissage présenté les étapes du changement de Pastor et Bréard (2004), lesquelles s’inspirent des écrits de Lewin (1951) visant une coconstruction des changements. L’exemple de mise en application donné permet de mettre en relief les efforts des intervenants dans les centres de petite enfance (CPE), des organisations d’économie sociale des régions de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue et du Nord-du-Québec afin, dans un premier temps, de s’engager dans un processus d’amélioration continue de la qualité éducative et, par la suite, de maintenir ces efforts pour que les pratiques nouvelles s’intègrent à leur quotidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".