Adolescent injuries in relation to economic status: An international perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Injuries account for a large proportion of morbidity and needs for medical care in otherwise generally healthy school children. Improved understanding of the social context of injuries could help to focus more effective injury prevention interventions. The Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study is a multinational quadrennial school-based survey conducted since 1983, using representative samples of 11, 13 and 15-year-old students. In 1997–98, 12 countries (Flemish Belgium, Canada, England, Estonia, Hungary, Israel, Lithuania, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA) collected information regarding the epidemiology of medically attended non-fatal injuries among school children, thus providing an opportunity to investigate the relationship between the influence of social and economic status and of risk of injury. This study also provides an opportunity to examine the relationships from an international perspective and to show similarities and differences between different countries. The application of the same standard questionnaire in different countries permits analyses of a large sample by combining results obtained from all participating HBSC members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".