L’expérience de la Commission Femmes et ville de la Ville de Québec vue de l’intérieur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l'auteure fait un retour critique sur la jeune histoire de la Commission femmes et ville de la Ville de Québec, une structure mise en place par la Ville de Québec dans la première moitié des années 90 dans le but de promouvoir la participation des femmes à la vie municipale et d'améliorer les conditions de vie des citoyennes de Québec. Sa collaboration personnelle à cette nouvelle instance municipale lui permet de jeter un regard éclairé sur les réalisations et les limites de cette expérience inédite au Québec. Elle met en lumière, entre autres choses, la difficulté à établir des liens étroits entre cette commission à caractère local et les groupes de femmes, plus actifs sur la scène nationale que municipale, ainsi que la très grande vulnérabilité de cette structure vouée à la promotion des femmes dans le contexte actuel d'austérité budgétaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".