MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153149041 · doi:10.1109/intlec.1997.645922

A new control strategy for DC voltage regulation and VAr generation using PWM three-phase rectifier

2002· article· en· W2153149041 on OpenAlexaff
N. Mendalek, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Ambrish Chandra, R. Parimelalagan, V. Rajagopalan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardPulse-width modulationOperating pointPWM rectifierRectifier (neural networks)Computer scienceSmall-signal modelOpen-loop controllerVoltageEngineeringControl engineeringElectronic engineeringClosed loopControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic PWM boost converter with six bidirectional current switches has been used as a reactive power generator or as a controlled rectifier and many control strategies have been developed for these two applications. A closed loop control of the dual-mode operation combining the VAr generation and the DC link voltage regulation, using a single converter is considered in this paper. The details of such a closed loop control based on the state space model, using synchronous d-q frame variables, are presented in order to achieve stable operation with improved dynamic response. During the design, the input reactor and the carrier frequency are at first selected based on open loop simulations. In order to compensate for the known nonlinearity in the state space model and facilitate the computation of the operating point variables and the feedforward terms; a gain scheduling technique is applied on one of the state variables. The feedback control is applied on the small signal model about the operating point, using pole-placement technique. Simulation results validating the closed loop operation of the complete system are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207