MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153149909 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2014-0409

Investigation of hydraulic parameters and cavitation in Kheir Abad flood release structure

2015· article· en· W2153149909 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sajjad Mohammadpour Zalaki, Hossein Fathian, Ebrahim Zalaghi, Farhad Kalantar Hormozi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpillwayHydraulicsFlood mythCavitationFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringHydraulic structureSoftwareGeologyEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simulation of flow behaviors before the construction of spillways using physical model and simulating packages is a crucial task. This paper investigates the flow behaviors in Kheir Abad flood release structure on Ab Shirin River, Iran by using Flow3D software and the results were compared with those of the physical model. First, by setting up a virtual model of spillway, the software performance was verified and calibrated. Then, by entering different flow discharge values, the two-dimensional flow hydraulics through the spillway was simulated by the software and flow depths, velocities and pressure were obtained for different flow discharges along the spillway. The cavitation was calculated based on the hydraulic parameters. The results show that Flow3D software is capable of simulating two-dimensional hydraulic flow over spillways. The results also indicate that the Kheir Abad flood release structure performs well during flood events considering cavitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207