MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153182992 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2010.2092785

Indirect Adaptive Control of an Electrohydraulic Servo System Based on Nonlinear Backstepping

2011· article· en· W2153182992 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Kaddissi, Jean‐Pierre Kenné, Maarouf Saad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemAdaptive controlController (irrigation)Control engineeringComputer scienceServomechanismPosition (finance)Hydraulic machineryControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the real-time position control of an electrohydraulic system using indirect adaptive backstepping. Electrohydraulic systems are known to be highly nonlinear and nondifferentiable. Backstepping is used for being a powerful, nonlinear control strategy and for its ability to ensure an asymptotic stability of the controlled system without canceling useful nonlinearities. On the other hand, hydraulic parameters are prone to variations; it is, therefore, useful to employ an adaptive control strategy in order to update the controller with the parameters variation. In such a case, indirect adaptive control is highly recommended, among other adaptive controller types, as it has the benefit of identifying the real system parameters value. Since not much literature is available for the indirect method as applied to the hydraulic systems, because of its implementation complexity, this paper shows how efficiently this method can handle the parameter estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations128
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207