MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153227189 · doi:10.7202/1026238ar

Une scène incontrôlable ? L’encadrement juridique des pratiques théâtrales à Lille et dans sa région à l’époque de la Réforme

2014· article· fr· W2153227189 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katell Lavéant

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En parallèle à la législation impériale qui se met en place au cours du xvi e siècle dans les Pays-Bas pour contrôler le théâtre comme possible instrument de propagation des idées de la Réforme, il existe une longue tradition locale dans les villes francophones de la région qui régule l’activité dramatique depuis le xiv e siècle au moins. En analysant ces différentes sources, et en prenant l’exemple spécifique des registres des délibérations du Magistrat de Lille, on peut étudier le rôle que le théâtre — et plus généralement l’ensemble de la culture récréative et des spectacles — a pu jouer comme lieu d’expression pour les protestants dans cette région. Il apparaît alors que c’est bien le statut hybride du théâtre, entre écrit et oral, qui a pu constituer un outil efficace pour les sympathisants de la Réforme, acteurs comme spectateurs, pour déjouer le contrôle des autorités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207