MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153227769 · doi:10.1139/e00-061

Late Maastrichtian age of spherule deposits in northeastern Mexico: implication for Chicxulub scenario

2001· article· en· W2153227769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wolfgang Stinnesbeck, P. Schulte, F. Lindenmaier, Thierry Adatte, Mark Affolter, Lionel Schilli, Gerta Keller, Doris Stüben, Zsolt Berner, U. Kramar, S. Burns, J. G. Lopez-Oliva

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarlGeologySlumpingPelagic zoneCretaceousSiliciclasticPaleontologyDeposition (geology)OverprintingGeochemistrySedimentary depositional environmentStructural basinOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the La Sierrita area of Nuevo Leon, Mexico, three spherule layers are present and separated from the overlying siliciclastic deposits by up to 6 m of pelagic marls. The marls are of latest Maastrichtian age (Plummerita hantkeninoides (CF1) Zone, Micula prinsii Zone) and deposited under normal pelagic conditions with no significant evidence of reworking or slumping. Original deposition of the spherule layers occurred during the last 300 ka of the Maastrichtian and well prior to the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K–T) boundary event. Thus, if the spherules in northeastern Mexico provide critical evidence of an impact at Chicxulub, this impact predates the K–T boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207