MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153238883 · doi:10.4141/p05-191

Foliar application of elicitors alters isoflavone concentrations and other seed characteristics of field-grown soybean

2006· article· en· W2153238883 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. M. Al‐Tawaha, Philippe Séguin, Donald L. Smith, Carole Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElicitorIsoflavonesCultivarPoint of deliveryBiologyNutraceuticalGlycineHorticulturePlant physiologyBotanyAgronomyFood scienceAmino acidEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a key species used by the nutraceutical industry, as it contains isoflavones that have beneficial effects on human health. A 2-yr field study was conducted in Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, to determine the effects of foliar application of elicitor compounds on isoflavone concentrations of seeds, seed yield, and other important seed characteristics. Two soybean cultivars (AC Proteina and AC Orford) were treated with one of four elicitors: lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCO) Bj V (C 18:1 MeFuc) and Bj V (Ac, C 16 , MeFuc), chitosan, and actinomycetes spores (Streptomyces melanosporofaciens strain EF-76), each applied at two soybean stages of development [vegetative (V4), and early podding (R3)]. Untreated controls were also included. Total and individual isoflavone concentrations were determined by HPLC. Seed yield, 100-seed weight, seeds per pod, pods per plant and oil and crude protein concentrations were concurrently determined. Total and individual isoflavone concentrations were affected by year and cultivar, which also interacted with elicitors. Interactions indicated that plant response to elicitors varied greatly depending on cultivars and years. Compared with an untreated control, some elicitors resulted in total isoflavone concentration increases ranging between 67 and 87%. No single elicitor treatment, however, consistently increased isoflavone concentrations. There were three-way interactions (year, cultivar and elicitors) for seed yield and number of pods per plants indicating, again, substantial variation in response to elicitors. Response was much greater in 2004, where elicitors consistently increased seed yield and number of pods per plant. Elicitors did not affect crude protein and oil concentrations. The use of elicitor compounds seems promising as a means of increasing isoflavone concentrations and seed yield; evaluations in a greater number of environments are now required. Key words: Soybean, isoflavone, daidzein, genistein, glycitein, protein, oil, seed yield, chitosan, actinomycetes, lipo-chitooligosaccharides

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207