Can Atlantic salmon smolt twice? Endocrine and biochemical changes during smolting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smolting is characterized by morphological and physiological changes, some of which are reversible if fish remain in freshwater. Whether fish that smolt in the first year will repeat physiological changes associated with smolting a second time is not known. To assess whether Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) can smolt more than once, we sampled hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon at monthly intervals for 2 years beginning the fall after hatching. Fish showed differences in rate of growth and were easily differentiated by size into upper mode (UM) and lower mode (LM) by the first fall. In the first spring, gill Na+,K+-ATPase activity of UM and LM fish increased six- and three-fold, respectively. Plasma growth hormone levels in spring were significantly elevated in UM fish but not in LM. Plasma cortisol levels changed little and gill corticosteroid receptor concentration did not differ between the groups. During the summer, gill Na+,K+-ATPase activity declined in both groups and remained low until the next spring. The second spring, growth hormone levels did not increase significantly and cortisol levels increased. The increase in gill Na+,K+-ATPase activity and cortisol and high saltwater tolerance indicate that UM Atlantic salmon can smolt in two consecutive years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".