Bibliographic record
Abstract
À leur arrivée à Limoilou en 1902, les capucins toulousains héritent d'une paroisse pauvre au bord de la banqueroute. Avec prudence, ils relèvent les finances malgré de nombreuses difficultés dont un grave incendie qui ravage l'église Saint-Charles en 1916. Leur oeuvre pastorale vise un encadrement moral et social du milieu en pleine expansion. En 30 ans, la population du quartier est multipliée par vingt et de nouvelles paroisses sont fondées. L'action des capucins déborde le cadre religieux, animant la vie culturelle et communautaire et les engageant dans l'action sociale directe en particulier pendant la crise économique de 1930. Au fil des années, la communauté se « canadianise ». Le noviciat établi à Limoilou en 1903, permet une adaptation de l'ordre des frères mineurs capucins aux réalités locales et, après un « régime français » de 30 ans, les postes de curé et de gardien du couvent passent définitivement aux mains des Québécois en 1934.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".