MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153265117 · doi:10.1039/b102186i

Mechanistic examination of the titania photocatalyzed oxidation of ethanolamines

2001· article· en· W2153265117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthanolaminesDiethanolamineChemistryEthanolamineTriethanolamineEthylamineAmine gas treatingInorganic chemistryAqueous solutionAlkoxideAmmoniumPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study we focus on elucidating the mechanism of the photocatalyzed transformation of the primary, secondary and tertiary amines found in ethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine when present in illuminated aqueous titania dispersions. Photodecomposition of these ethanolamines leads to the evolution of CO2 through prior formation of various intermediate species. Ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate ions (NO3−) are the ultimate products formed in the photoconversion of the amine nitrogen atoms, with NH4+ cations produced in greater quantity than NO3− anions for all three ethanolamines. Photooxidation of triethanolamine yields various intermediates, including a 3-pyrrolidone derivative, diethanolamine, and then ethanolamine, before complete mineralization occurs. The nature of the initial steps in the photodegradation was predicted by computer-aided molecular orbital (MO) calculations of point charges, and by frontier electron densities of all atoms in the ethanolamine structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it