MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153282662 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2002.1013071

Multifractal modelling of arbitrary object boundaries in image segmentation

2003· article· en· W2153282662 on OpenAlexaff
Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Witold Kinsner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary (topology)Multifractal systemFractalImage segmentationArtificial intelligenceSegmentationWaveletComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Computer visionMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of approximation of arbitrary boundaries and edges resulting from image segmentation. Using MPEG-7 terminology, this problem can be considered as the search for a descriptor for a boundary feature of an object. The shape of an object is usually described by its boundaries, to differentiate it from the other regions of the image. Traditionally, Bezier curve fitting has been employed to model the boundaries of objects consisting of smooth and crisp curves. However, natural images contain complex shapes that are difficult to describe by such smooth-boundary modelling techniques. Consequently, we focus on fractals and multifractals to model arbitrary boundaries based on the singularity measure property of fractals. We use wavelets to identify boundary control points and reconstruct the self-similar boundaries with any fractal or multifractal dimension, using the midpoint displacement algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207