MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153299586 · doi:10.1063/1.3292577

Dissociation of dicarboxylate and disulfonate dianions

2010· article· en· W2153299586 on OpenAlexaff
Shaun G. Ard, Nasrin Mirsaleh‐Kohan, Jeffrey D. Steill, Jos Oomens, Steen Brøndsted Nielsen, R. N. Compton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersDivision of ChemistryNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInfrared multiphoton dissociationDissociation (chemistry)ChemistryFragmentation (computing)MoleculeIonCarboxylateElectronegativityPhotochemistryComputational chemistryAtomic physicsPhysical chemistryStereochemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collision-induced dissociation (CID), along with infrared multiple photon dissociation/detachment (IRMPD) techniques, is utilized to study a series of doubly substituted aromatic dianions containing sulfonate and carboxylate functionalities (1,2- and 1,3-benzenedisulfonate, 1,5-naphthalenedisulfonate, 2,6-naphthalenedisulfonate, 4-sulfobenzoate, 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate, and terephthalate dianions). The molecules were chosen because of the electronegativity of the CO(2) and SO(3) moieties along with their varied spatial separation in order to investigate the effect of the repulsive Coulomb barrier (RCB) on the dianions' respective dissociation pathways. Density functional theory calculations of the structures, electron detachment and dissociation energies, as well as vibrational frequencies are performed. Calculated infrared active vibrational frequencies are largely in agreement with the IRMPD spectra which provide support for interpretations based upon computed energies. Calculated and experimental results show that fragmentation dominates over electron detachment as the lowest energy dissociation pathway for these systems and the nature of this dissociation is dictated by properties of the substituent group. CID and IRMPD of dianions with two sulfonate groups (SO(3)(-)) resulted in a single dissociation channel leading to observation of SO(3)(-) and its anion conjugate pair, whereas the carboxylate (CO(2)(-)) containing dianions dissociated via loss of one or both CO(2) molecules and an electron. The SO(3)(-) collisional dissociation exhibited a clear energetic threshold toward ionic fragmentation with an isomeric dependence that is in reasonable agreement with a simple electrostatic model of the RCB, as well as with published reports on electron photodetachment. The loss of one or both CO(2) units and an electron from CID of the carboxylate dianions appeared with no threshold (dissociation occurs with no collision gas), implying these dianions to be metastable toward the dissociation pathway. However, calculations show these ions to be energetically stable toward dissociation as well as electron detachment. More importantly, in the case of the 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate dianion, experiments performed at the FELIX Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance facility and the ELISA electrostatic storage ring, where ions are collisionally cooled prior to analysis, showed this ion to be stable (tau>1.5 s). We conclude that the carboxylate (CO(2)(-)) containing dianions formed in the present CID experiment are electronically stable but vibrationally metastable due to internal energy imparted in the harsh electrospray conditions. The delocalized nature of the excess electrons associated with the carboxylate containing dianions may lead to circumvention of the RCB by dissociating via neutral fragmentation followed by (or accompanied by) electron detachment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207