MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153303771 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2008.916684

Effects of Artificial Magnetic Conductors in the Design of Low-Profile High-Gain Planar Antennas With High-Permittivity Dielectric Superstrate

2009· article· en· W2153303771 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround planeDirectivityConductorElectrical conductorPerfect conductorDielectricMaterials sciencePlanarAntenna (radio)PermittivityOpticsRadiation patternPolarization (electrochemistry)OptoelectronicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceScatteringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cavity resonance antennas with dielectric superstrate are considered with different ground plane types namely, perfect electric conductor (PEC), perfect magnetic conductor (PMC), and artificial magnetic conductor (AMC). Radiation properties of these antennas are computed using transverse equivalent network (TEN) model. It is shown that the effects of angular and polarization dependency of artificial ground planes can be beneficial or detrimental to the antenna performance in directivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it