MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153306627 · doi:10.7202/1012801ar

Perceptions des professionnels de leurs pratiques auprès des parents de jeunes enfants

2012· article· fr· W2153306627 on OpenAlex
Francine de Montigny, Carl Lacharité

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude vise à décrire les croyances et les perceptions des intervenants de leurs pratiques professionnelles et à examiner la nature des relations entre leurs croyances, leurs perceptions des parents ainsi que les principes et les pratiques qu’ils adoptent. Une étude quantitative descriptive et corrélationnelle effectuée auprès de 203 intervenants révèle un modèle de l’engagement des professionnels dans les soins et les services à l’égard des parents de jeunes enfants. Lorsque les intervenants adoptent des principes d’empowerment, ils perçoivent les parents qu’ils côtoient plus positivement et réussissent à mettre en place des pratiques professionnelles collaboratives auprès des parents de jeunes enfants en contexte de vulnérabilité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it