Heavy mineral record of Andean uplift and changing sediment sources across the NE margin of South America: a case study from Trinidad and Barbados
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The heavy mineral compositions of sandstones in Trinidad and Barbados record the onset of Andean-related erosion and a reduction of craton-derived sediments into NE South America. The changing provenance was deduced by comparing heavy mineral assemblages interpreted from ancient sandstones with associations recognized in modern sands that can be reasonably correlated to existing tectonic domains. The impact of the Andean orogeny across the margin was to introduce a suite of minerals characteristic of low-temperature metamorphism that today is prevalent adjacent to the Caribbean Mountain belt and differs from the zircon-rich assemblage produced within cratonic plains. Twenty-one Paleocene–Late Pliocene sandstone samples from Trinidad revealed systematic changes in mineral diversity and maturity that recorded this provenance transition, and suggests Andean erosion during deposition of the Late Oligocene Nariva Formation. Similar to Palaeogene sandstones of Trinidad, four Eocene Scotland Formation samples from Barbados support craton derivation, but with additional evidence of minor Andean input probably due to the proximity of the Scotland Formation delivery systems to an earlier uplift episode. By the Late Miocene, most of the sediments delivered into Trinidad basins were supplied from the Andean orogeny as suggested by the relative abundance of minerals of this affinity. The heavy mineral records of Trinidad and Barbados are similar to that described across northern South America from both modern and ancient environments that collectively mark the uplift of the Andean mountain belt, with its strong influence on drainage patterns and reservoir provenance along this sector of the continental margin. Supplementary material: Sample location coordinates, sample and outcrop photographs, and summary outcrop sections are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18728 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".