Le son tactile ou la sensorialité excentrique dans les performances solos de Magali Babin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment l’éphémère frôlement d’une caresse peut-il devenir un objet esthétique ? Comment l’effleurement digital sur l’épiderme minéral d’une feuille de schiste peut-il devenir musique ? Comment l’intime expérience tactile peut-elle devenir l’espace d’un rituel artistique collectif ? Comment le son électronique devient-il, chez Magali Babin, médium d’une sensorialité excentrique ? Cet article nous emmène dans l’une des contrées de la pratique de Magali Babin : le monde tactile de l’audio qu’elle déploie dans ses performances solos. Auteure d’une oeuvre sonore polymorphe, Magali Babin est une artiste québécoise, performeure, compositrice et interprète, inaugurant depuis deux ans les pratiques installatives sonores. Elle est une figure majeure de la scène alternative montréalaise en art audio, de l’improvisation « à risque » ainsi que de la musique expérimentale, déambulant librement entre les catégories artistiques les plus actuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".