MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153333998 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.080626

Antibiotic use and population ecology: How you can reduce your "resistance footprint"

2009· review· en· W2153333998 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
David M. Patrick, James Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)BC Centre for Disease Control
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsTachypneaBronchitisAntibioticsHarmTachycardiaMedicineAntibiotic resistancePopulationResistance (ecology)Intensive care medicineEcologyPediatricsEnvironmental healthBiologyInternal medicineMicrobiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 8-year-old child presents with a 4-day history of a nonproductive cough and a temperature of 38°C. Her chest is clear, except for some wheezing. She has no tachypnea or tachycardia. The child's father is deeply concerned. What would be the harm of prescribing antibiotics for acute bronchitis?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207