Les pères en situation d’exclusion économique et sociale : les rejoindre, les soutenir adéquatement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Que savons-nous de la manière dont les jeunes hommes en situation d’exclusion et de pauvreté assument leur paternité ? Les recherches portant sur cette population sont encore très rares. Actuellement, la connaissance scientifique de la paternité est fortement teintée de l’expérience des pères qui possèdent des revenus suffisants. De plus, très souvent les informations dont on dispose au sujet de ces pères proviennent de témoignages de mères qui tracent un portrait généralement dévalorisant de pères, perçus comme étant absents et comme n’assumant pas leurs responsabilités face aux enfants. Quelques recherches ayant recueilli les témoignages de pères en situation économiquement précaire montrent toutefois une autre facette de cette population. Le présent article propose un modèle de compréhension de l’engagement paternel en contexte d’exclusion économique et sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".