MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153372737 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1996.550793

Fast nonlinear adaptive filtering using a partial window conjugate gradient algorithm

2002· article· en· W2153372737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugate gradient methodAlgorithmBackpropagationConvergence (economics)Nonlinear systemRate of convergenceNonlinear conjugate gradient methodArtificial neural networkAdaptive filterWindow (computing)Gradient descentComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a modified form of the partial conjugate gradient algorithm is presented for use in nonlinear filtering using neural networks. The algorithm is based on using a gradient average window to provide a trade-off between convergence rate and complexity which, depending on the choice of averaging window, is (in both complexity and speed of convergence) intermediate between the conventional backpropagation (BP) algorithm and the Newton methods. An additional simplification is introduced by replacing the calculated optimum step size /spl alpha//sub k/ by a normalized step size /spl alpha/~, in the same manner as the normalized LMS algorithm. This new algorithm is applied to a cascaded neural network/nonlinear least mean squares structure for the identification of a nonlinear system. This proposed algorithm demonstrates improved convergence rates with even small choices of window size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207