Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines some conceptual issues that arise when we consider the implications of introducing restorative justice in prison. Using the definition of ‘security’ as ‘without care,’ the analysis focuses on two key restorative justice concepts: relationships and values. The significance of relationships in restorative justice is emphasized through the lens of aboriginal justice where healing of individuals and their relationships is centered. Values have to do with justice and care. These concepts are discussed in concert with two specific rehabilitative strategies in Canadian federal prisons—education and correctional programming—and then with the general rehabilitation project of the prison in Canadian democratic society. Significant contradictions occur, however, when we attempt to nest the rehabilitative ideals of relationships and values in the context of a punitive total institution whose overriding emphasis is on security. These contradictions are intensified when competing versions of security as ‘attachment’ from a human development perspective challenge the penal notion of security as ‘detachment and separation.’
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it